Renaud Tognelli wrote: > > Nevertheless I donīt think that adding one or two classes to the package is > really a problem, and it could make the package far easier to use. > > And the easier it is the better it is, is'nt it ? Yes of course. I think we all agree that we need some additional classes handling HTTP transport including the SOAPaction, Soap fault exceptions and the actual RPC call. My proposal is the following: I try to merge the classes sent by you and Daryl with my own "vision" into a http transport class (in org.ksoap.http). After that, we take a look if we need an explicit additional "Call" class (derived from SoapObject?), and whether it should be optional or not. Best regards, Stefan -- Stefan Haustein Univ. Dortmund, FB 4, LS 8 tel: +49 231 755 2499 Baroper Str. 301 fax: +49 231 755 5105 D-44221 Dortmund (Germany) www-ai.cs.uni-dortmund.de |